Here's to enforcing your "no returns" policy...

Here's a link to the incredibly in-expansive article...

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090429/ap_on_fe_st/us_customer_punched;_ylt=Ajx5xjVQ4lVBINVsINCEjPjtiBIF

We've all been there, right? Screw Gandhi, the customer is not always right...(just ask Microsoft).

Anyway, having a "no returns" policy is one thing. Enforcing it is another.

And finally it took this 52 year old to show us all how to do it!

God forbid if I ever had to return anything to Radioshack again...!

Okay, when was the last time anyone bought anything at a Radioshack?!

Is that place a museum of "current electronics on sale" or what...

Claimer: Views presented in this article probably or definitely allude to people real, unreal, imaginary, virtual and otherwise. Any harm or libel cast on people dead, alive or transient is either intentional or otherwise. The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author, however he refuses to take responsibility for said views and believes the use of "airquotes" to be a birthright. Claims not included in this claim are also claimed.

You shouldn't rob a bank when you are this busy....

Here is the link to the original article:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/30361435/

Happens everyday doesn't it ? (No it doesn't)

Pregnant woman decides to rob bank. Pregnant woman holds up cashier.

Get's call on the phone...and walks off.

Maybe we should have a law "No talking on the cellphone while robbing banks".

I am sure the California legislature can make time for this, in case the woman decides to travel here for her future deeds...!

Claimer: Views presented in this article probably or definitely allude to people real, unreal, imaginary, virtual and otherwise. Any harm or libel cast on people dead, alive or transient is either intentional or otherwise. The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author, however he refuses to take responsibility for said views and believes the use of "airquotes" to be a birthright. Claims not included in this claim are also claimed.

Want to carelessly allow your factory to blow up? Care not to explain what happened? Love to cover up mistakes using anti-terrorism laws?..,

[Please click here to read original article]

The Coast Guard can help!

Or it would seem to be the case. The article I have linked up there is right on the dot - never noticed the explosion in the Bayer plant. But there is more than one reason why you or I would not notice such a thing.

What would they be?

Here is the scenario, right? - Plant blows up. Plant explosion kills 2 people. Company explains.

Uh, apparently no. Not only did Bayer get away with it, the Coast Guard is helping them too. Very nicely done. So, one hand the Supreme Court shuts out responsibility using preemption on the part of FDA, so that organizations don't have to answer to the patients they injure or kill. On the other hand, anti-terrorism laws and the Coast Guard of all the people help organizations to shirk the responsibility of answering to the public and the people they killed..

Oh yes, Congress is holding "hearings". Remember the last time "Congress" and the "FDA" got Bayer to back off calling "Aspirin" a "Dietary Supplement"!?

Hmmm, may the groveling in front of Bayer begin. What a lovely lot they must be to invest in. No Government, law, logical or common sense can get to them...


Claimer: Views presented in this article probably or definitely allude to people real, unreal, imaginary, virtual and otherwise. Any harm or libel cast on people dead, alive or transient is either intentional or otherwise. The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author, however he refuses to take responsibility for said views and believes the use of "airquotes" to be a birthright. Claims not included in this claim are also claimed.