Thursday, March 25, 2010

The patron saint of devils, or child molesters?

You know how it is, right?

You work hard for years, systematically covering up all the dirt under the carpet and calling all other religions weak.

Finally, they give you a high seat, a balcony with a view of blind followers and a white frock with a cap.

When the whole child molestation thing came back up, I didn't feel surprised or in the midst of new news. This of course was followed by confusion about some Cardinal Ratzinger.

I was like who is this Ratzinger? Well, the rat should have given it away. god's (grammatical error intended to avoid misplaced respect of the dis-respectable or the non-existent) messenger on Earth defends child molesters. Cute, the ways of god.

Turns out Ratzinger is our friend, Z Pope. What and who he "Benedicts" to, is probably going to shock you...

It reads like a bad imitation of a Sidney Sheldon. How did one man have so much power to cover so many crimes across several countries? And how the frick did he become the leader of what now appears to be an offensive and rather dangerous clan?

Makes the crazy bastards from the Texas clan (the one they recently disbanded by sending in the FBI) look less daunting.

Separation of the church from my ..., leave alone the Government please. How disgusting?

The massive "Catholic Church" scam

I think we should first investigate this guy and start asking him some serious questions. More importantly we need to develop a clear understanding as to why the law enforcement agencies have not started disbanding these churches.

It is impossible to believe that statutes and other drivel would have gotten in the way. I guess it is easier to harass seniors for computer glitches (this is what the real NYPD does in it's spare time, actually, during work time) and write speeding tickets to well meaning citizens.

And there are politicians worried that if they didn't support this guy, they wouldn't get communion from this guy and his band of "priests".

Not that any "religion" should, but could anyone else have gotten away with such sub-human behavior?

Who else thought they should throw up?

If you have no idea of what I am talking about read this and weep:

http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2010/03/26/us/AP-Church-Abuse-Wisconsin.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1


Claimer: Views presented in this article probably or definitely allude to people real, unreal, imaginary, virtual and otherwise. Any harm or libel cast on people dead, alive or transient is either intentional or otherwise. The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author, however he refuses to take responsibility for said views and believes the use of "airquotes" to be a birthright. Claims not included in this claim are also claimed.

Copyright Information: Whereas the blog postings themselves are stolen by the author from the recesses of his deranged mind, he holds all the rights to everything on this blog. Yet, he secretly hopes you will copy his stuff to satisfy his ego. He may still sue you to prove to the world that he makes stuff worth pirating...seriously, still reading this?

Monday, March 08, 2010

Reuters Expose: Barack Obama is Israel's secret President (or the post known as how dumb is Reuters)

Emulating  Fox "News", I need to say: This is a rush transcript (by which they usually mean it is cooked up, unmitigated drivel).

Though I have been taking a break from blogging because I am working on a top secret project, I could not resist this one...

We have all been there. The spell-checker messes up, or we have just been too spaced out. But you have to be dumb to pay and get paid to write, edit, and publish stuff that is supposedly journalistic and other hogwash and mix up something this big.

We are talking about the world's most powerful man, his sidekick (who is usually the one mixing things up, notwithstanding Obama's seances and special Olympics), the world's most aggressive nation and the USA.

How can you mix things up so bad on the first line of the frigging article?

Maybe next time "Dan Williams" and "Jon Hemmings" should turn down the volume on the Oscars, take a sip less or so and read what they write and edit?

Here's to wishing for those "high" (no, not that high, Cheech, Chong, Kumar and Harold) journalistic standards that people lament will disappear if we don't pay for such drivel..

And what is with that random sprinkling of "Barack Obama" links around the article?

Now, maybe there really was a problem with Obama's oath taking, along with the whole birth certificate mystery and him dressing up as a clown and robbing banks while imposing socialism on all of us....phew, long sentence n'est pas? Not enough space on the inner palm to note down...

Also makes you wonder, if Biden is still the Vice President (Reuters, in this article of the legends, never reveals who the big boss is), who is the current President of the U.S.?

Is Obama moonlighting?

Or is Cheney our secret President! Oh wow! or was it Oh No?!!!

Link to this well crafted piece of "journalism":

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE6271YE20100308

Conclusion:

Hey, I write crap too (mostly by plan), will Reuters pay me? I know Rupert will...just watch - shut up Srihari, don't fight the big media. They have lawyers that will come after money you don't have (and if the lawyers are as good as their journalists...). And, you are not cute like Colbert....

Claimer: Views presented in this article probably or definitely allude to people real, unreal, imaginary, virtual and otherwise. Any harm or libel cast on people dead, alive or transient is either intentional or otherwise. The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author, however he refuses to take responsibility for said views and believes the use of "airquotes" to be a birthright. Claims not included in this claim are also claimed.

Copyright Information: Whereas the blog postings themselves are stolen by the author from the recesses of his deranged mind, he holds all the rights to everything on this blog. Yet, he secretly hopes you will copy his stuff to satisfy his ego. He may still sue you to prove to the world that he makes stuff worth pirating...seriously, still reading this?