[Please click on the following to read original article]
Somehow, it appears to me that I could be a better Congressman (and no, no trans..gotchas here) than her.
The problem - I can beat KKK, I mean Kansas Congresswoman - just stuttered there. Sorry, I didn't mean to say she belongs to the Klan. Hopefully, the Klan members are understanding and forgive me. Or should Jenkins forgive me?
Maybe we should all buy each other some beers?
To read about the wonder Jenkins is: Click Here
Hey Jenkins, true, Obama might need a bright, white light shined on him (apparently that's what she meant).
How about you?
The good news here is that she has apologized instead of demanding one from us for possibly mis-under-representing her!
Why can't we find a better place to put our societal misfits? Why send them to Congress.
After all, there is Fox News....
Claimer: Views presented in this article probably or definitely allude to people real, unreal, imaginary, virtual and otherwise. Any harm or libel cast on people dead, alive or transient is either intentional or otherwise. The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author, however he refuses to take responsibility for said views and believes the use of "airquotes" to be a birthright. Claims not included in this claim are also claimed.
Thursday, August 27, 2009
Monday, August 24, 2009
Sure, you love their neighbor, but how much?
Here comes the benchmark:
Two neighbors live next to each other for 30 years. One of them becomes sick, and the other helps her with car rides to dialysis stints at the Hospital and what not.
Later, she tops it off by donating her kidney as well....
How is that for feel good Monday?
Here is your link:
Click Here
Claimer: Views presented in this article probably or definitely allude to people real, unreal, imaginary, virtual and otherwise. Any harm or libel cast on people dead, alive or transient is either intentional or otherwise. The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author, however he refuses to take responsibility for said views and believes the use of "airquotes" to be a birthright. Claims not included in this claim are also claimed.
Two neighbors live next to each other for 30 years. One of them becomes sick, and the other helps her with car rides to dialysis stints at the Hospital and what not.
Later, she tops it off by donating her kidney as well....
How is that for feel good Monday?
Here is your link:
Click Here
Claimer: Views presented in this article probably or definitely allude to people real, unreal, imaginary, virtual and otherwise. Any harm or libel cast on people dead, alive or transient is either intentional or otherwise. The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author, however he refuses to take responsibility for said views and believes the use of "airquotes" to be a birthright. Claims not included in this claim are also claimed.
Saturday, August 15, 2009
America's gift to Indians on their Independence: Humiliation of their public figures at the airports
[Please click on the following to read original article]
Alright, Shah Rukh Khan is an entertainer. However, he is also a Muslim.
How can the U.S. Customs pass up this opportunity to show how they are better than India at handling religious minorities?
They detained him for 66 minutes (wonder what idiot was sitting around counting that).
However, what was more humiliating was when they did a personal padding on the most honored living Indian Abdul Kalam when he was about to board a flight to India.
Okay, genius (hey, I am not looking to be detained at an airport, so you should replace this with EXACTLY what I would like to say, after all, I am not even famous) is probably the personal property of the DHS, TSA and other Federal Agencies that know how to "Win Friends andInsult well meaning Indians Influence People"..
However, can someone please explain why India's movie stars are on TSA's list?
And as a taxpayer in the US, can I seek out a reason as to why TSA'S list of people to stop, bother and humiliate is so, so to speak, "listless"?
I am just thanking Jesus' Dad that Gandhi is not alive today to be detained by the TSA...
Claimer: Views presented in this article probably or definitely allude to people real, unreal, imaginary, virtual and otherwise. Any harm or libel cast on people dead, alive or transient is either intentional or otherwise. The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author, however he refuses to take responsibility for said views and believes the use of "airquotes" to be a birthright. Claims not included in this claim are also claimed.
Alright, Shah Rukh Khan is an entertainer. However, he is also a Muslim.
How can the U.S. Customs pass up this opportunity to show how they are better than India at handling religious minorities?
They detained him for 66 minutes (wonder what idiot was sitting around counting that).
However, what was more humiliating was when they did a personal padding on the most honored living Indian Abdul Kalam when he was about to board a flight to India.
Okay, genius (hey, I am not looking to be detained at an airport, so you should replace this with EXACTLY what I would like to say, after all, I am not even famous) is probably the personal property of the DHS, TSA and other Federal Agencies that know how to "Win Friends and
However, can someone please explain why India's movie stars are on TSA's list?
And as a taxpayer in the US, can I seek out a reason as to why TSA'S list of people to stop, bother and humiliate is so, so to speak, "listless"?
I am just thanking Jesus' Dad that Gandhi is not alive today to be detained by the TSA...
Claimer: Views presented in this article probably or definitely allude to people real, unreal, imaginary, virtual and otherwise. Any harm or libel cast on people dead, alive or transient is either intentional or otherwise. The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author, however he refuses to take responsibility for said views and believes the use of "airquotes" to be a birthright. Claims not included in this claim are also claimed.
Thursday, August 06, 2009
Bing Vs. Apple Vs. Google
Okay, the internet is full of idiots. Rupert Murdoch wants to charge for all his online content. These two statements may or may not be related.
But, thehero idiot of our blog posting here went to Bing and searched for "Why are Windows Expensive?".
Then he complains that it comes up with "Why are Macs so expensive".
For one, it is a great way to force people to actually search on Bing!
Now for the twenty questions
Maybe because "Windows" is a family of products?
Maybe because Windows is not expensive? (Alright, that was self-contradictory. Like that is news).
Maybe because Macs are expensive?
What happens if you go to Google and type: "Why is Google so expensive"?
It proves you are an ignoramus.
Okay, offending your own readers != good for blog stats
charging your readers = ?
Anyway, as a way to castigate myself:
http://www.google.com/webhp?hl=en&sourceid=navclient-ff&rlz=1B3GGGL_enUS317US318&ie=UTF-8#rlz=1B3GGGL_enUS317US318&hl=en&q=Why+is+Google+so+expensive%3F&aq=f&oq=&aqi=&fp=-NOfmsAwees
Alright, now go forth and multiply (your searches that is..)
On the Bing o' Rama:
http://advice.cio.com/shane_oneill/bing_search_tainted_by_pro_microsoft_results?commentpage=1#commentslink
Claimer: Views presented in this article probably or definitely allude to people real, unreal, imaginary, virtual and otherwise. Any harm or libel cast on people dead, alive or transient is either intentional or otherwise. The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author, however he refuses to take responsibility for said views and believes the use of "airquotes" to be a birthright. Claims not included in this claim are also claimed.
But, the
Then he complains that it comes up with "Why are Macs so expensive".
For one, it is a great way to force people to actually search on Bing!
Now for the twenty questions
Maybe because "Windows" is a family of products?
Maybe because Windows is not expensive? (Alright, that was self-contradictory. Like that is news).
Maybe because Macs are expensive?
What happens if you go to Google and type: "Why is Google so expensive"?
It proves you are an ignoramus.
Okay, offending your own readers != good for blog stats
charging your readers = ?
Anyway, as a way to castigate myself:
http://www.google.com/webhp?hl=en&sourceid=navclient-ff&rlz=1B3GGGL_enUS317US318&ie=UTF-8#rlz=1B3GGGL_enUS317US318&hl=en&q=Why+is+Google+so+expensive%3F&aq=f&oq=&aqi=&fp=-NOfmsAwees
Alright, now go forth and multiply (your searches that is..)
On the Bing o' Rama:
http://advice.cio.com/shane_oneill/bing_search_tainted_by_pro_microsoft_results?commentpage=1#commentslink
Claimer: Views presented in this article probably or definitely allude to people real, unreal, imaginary, virtual and otherwise. Any harm or libel cast on people dead, alive or transient is either intentional or otherwise. The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author, however he refuses to take responsibility for said views and believes the use of "airquotes" to be a birthright. Claims not included in this claim are also claimed.
Monday, August 03, 2009
With apple, where there is smoke there is a flame(-ing iPod?)
[Please click on the following to read original article]
Alright, this should only be the stuff of science fiction or stupid fiction, I don't know. You know, the story of a company gone mad?
Apple's legal team needs a vacation to reality (not away from it).
When you threaten people unreasonably, they will respond - only in the total opposite way of what you want.
I guess you would agree after reading the story, "Apple doesn't believe in first amendments" is a better title. Ever heard of a company with worse PR getting away with more?
Here is the rest of the story:
http://www.infoworld.com/d/mac/apple-accused-hushing-exploding-ipod-touch-claims-002?source=IFWNLE_nlt_wrapup_2009-08-03
Claimer: Views presented in this article probably or definitely allude to people real, unreal, imaginary, virtual and otherwise. Any harm or libel cast on people dead, alive or transient is either intentional or otherwise. The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author, however he refuses to take responsibility for said views and believes the use of "airquotes" to be a birthright. Claims not included in this claim are also claimed.
Alright, this should only be the stuff of science fiction or stupid fiction, I don't know. You know, the story of a company gone mad?
Apple's legal team needs a vacation to reality (not away from it).
When you threaten people unreasonably, they will respond - only in the total opposite way of what you want.
I guess you would agree after reading the story, "Apple doesn't believe in first amendments" is a better title. Ever heard of a company with worse PR getting away with more?
Here is the rest of the story:
http://www.infoworld.com/d/mac/apple-accused-hushing-exploding-ipod-touch-claims-002?source=IFWNLE_nlt_wrapup_2009-08-03
Claimer: Views presented in this article probably or definitely allude to people real, unreal, imaginary, virtual and otherwise. Any harm or libel cast on people dead, alive or transient is either intentional or otherwise. The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author, however he refuses to take responsibility for said views and believes the use of "airquotes" to be a birthright. Claims not included in this claim are also claimed.
Sunday, August 02, 2009
CNET.com now to become CheapNet.com
[Please click on the following to read original article]
Getting attention is the dream for most bloggers, present company not being an exception. It is also the dream for the magazines that talk about Alien abductions and homosexual Presidents who hide their birth certificates.
One would hope that the difference betweenFox News such magazines and good bloggers or journalists is that the latter would be "on the up and up".
Cnet.com apparently does not want to belong there. This afternoon, while lunching lazily, I was stalking Google News as usual, and there was a nice shiny red ball, I mean, an article/blog on how "Apple messes with your life". Naturally, I was lured, literally seduced, drawn in, charged, captivated...well you get the idea (hopefully, or put down the pipe).
And I read through an entire article feeling like I was still high from close contact with some much needed dish-washer fluid action. And then, I skimmed over to the comments section, only to be comforted that there were more who had been cheated by this timeshare salesman of the internet.
The blog/article is an inexorably bad exercise in cheap "hit-mongering". Throw in Apple and the iPhone and any idiot will read the story- except the internet is also the home for it's own infamous, instantaneous lynch mobs! So Chris Matyszczyk, the guy who wrote this brazen piece learns something about journalism.
Flimsy stories about iPhone-toting knuckleheads roaming the bars of Silicon Valley - describes about 95% of the people living in the Mar del Silicon, and there is absolutely nothing interesting about bringing out the fact that they spent most of their lives in close contacts with computers and as a consequence "lost it".
Hmm, hey did you hear Palin may be divorcing! See what reading CheapNet.com has made of me?
Reference:
Well, if I linked to this ill-famed blog posting I write about, I would be contradicting myself by giving it more hits..! Lol.
Claimer: Views presented in this article probably or definitely allude to people real, unreal, imaginary, virtual and otherwise. Any harm or libel cast on people dead, alive or transient is either intentional or otherwise. The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author, however he refuses to take responsibility for said views and believes the use of "airquotes" to be a birthright. Claims not included in this claim are also claimed.
Getting attention is the dream for most bloggers, present company not being an exception. It is also the dream for the magazines that talk about Alien abductions and homosexual Presidents who hide their birth certificates.
One would hope that the difference between
Cnet.com apparently does not want to belong there. This afternoon, while lunching lazily, I was stalking Google News as usual, and there was a nice shiny red ball, I mean, an article/blog on how "Apple messes with your life". Naturally, I was lured, literally seduced, drawn in, charged, captivated...well you get the idea (hopefully, or put down the pipe).
And I read through an entire article feeling like I was still high from close contact with some much needed dish-washer fluid action. And then, I skimmed over to the comments section, only to be comforted that there were more who had been cheated by this timeshare salesman of the internet.
The blog/article is an inexorably bad exercise in cheap "hit-mongering". Throw in Apple and the iPhone and any idiot will read the story- except the internet is also the home for it's own infamous, instantaneous lynch mobs! So Chris Matyszczyk, the guy who wrote this brazen piece learns something about journalism.
Flimsy stories about iPhone-toting knuckleheads roaming the bars of Silicon Valley - describes about 95% of the people living in the Mar del Silicon, and there is absolutely nothing interesting about bringing out the fact that they spent most of their lives in close contacts with computers and as a consequence "lost it".
Hmm, hey did you hear Palin may be divorcing! See what reading CheapNet.com has made of me?
Reference:
Well, if I linked to this ill-famed blog posting I write about, I would be contradicting myself by giving it more hits..! Lol.
Claimer: Views presented in this article probably or definitely allude to people real, unreal, imaginary, virtual and otherwise. Any harm or libel cast on people dead, alive or transient is either intentional or otherwise. The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author, however he refuses to take responsibility for said views and believes the use of "airquotes" to be a birthright. Claims not included in this claim are also claimed.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
