[Please click on title to read original article]
Immigration is a hot button everywhere. I am an Indian who is currently an immigrant in the US, and I know that immigrants who come to India also face some kind of issue.
A lot of immigration issues are contentious, but nothing made me sick in the stomach...until now. Mind you, its quite tough to make me sick in the stomach.
So yes, there is nothing funny in this blog.
The less said the better about this issue in Australia, the better. You know, whenever I used to see them in context of cricket with India, following all that nastiness a few months ago with Harbajan Singh and the recent emotional wails over their loss in India, it did bother me, just a bit.
I have also known that they have been very idiotic at handling immigration issues before.
Now, trying to stop someone who is serving their community because their son is a victim of Down's syndrome is....well, quite Australian.
You know a new expletive is born today.
Two things,
1. I wonder why people still want to immigrate to Australia
2. I am proud today of where I came from and where I live, two places that are not, well Australia...!
Claimer: Views presented in this article probably or definitely allude to people real, unreal, imaginary, virtual and otherwise. Any harm or libel cast on people dead, alive or transient is either intentional or otherwise. The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author, however he refuses to take responsibility for said views and believes the use of "airquotes" to be a birthright. Claims not included in this claim are also claimed.
Friday, October 31, 2008
Wednesday, October 22, 2008
Question to Subaru Outback Owners...!
[Please click on title to read original article]
Why does the TV ad about Subaru Outback owners make you look like how Apple makes Apple product owners?
You know...like the kind of people who like other people who are very much like them...in tastes, in looks, outside, inside everywhere?
Bloody Pricks at the Marketing Departments...
Here is the deal - a lot of us don't wash our fungling cars....that's because we are lazy.
Subaru Outback owners - you are also lazy, sloppy and dirty.
The only paradoxical problem is - people who like other people like themselves are stereotypically supposed to be very clean...
What? Oh, the stereotype hurts?
Well stop airing the frikking ads.
You don't need to own a Subaru Outback to love nature.
There is actually no need to own a Subaru Outback...unless, like the TV puts it, you like...well you get it - hmm, maybe not!!!
After all dirty cars is not how nature intended us to be!
Claimer: Views presented in this article probably or definitely allude to people real, unreal, imaginary, virtual and otherwise. Any harm or libel cast on people dead, alive or transient is either intentional or otherwise. The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author, however he refuses to take responsibility for said views and believes the use of "airquotes" to be a birthright. Claims not included in this claim are also claimed.
Why does the TV ad about Subaru Outback owners make you look like how Apple makes Apple product owners?
You know...like the kind of people who like other people who are very much like them...in tastes, in looks, outside, inside everywhere?
Bloody Pricks at the Marketing Departments...
Here is the deal - a lot of us don't wash our fungling cars....that's because we are lazy.
Subaru Outback owners - you are also lazy, sloppy and dirty.
The only paradoxical problem is - people who like other people like themselves are stereotypically supposed to be very clean...
What? Oh, the stereotype hurts?
Well stop airing the frikking ads.
You don't need to own a Subaru Outback to love nature.
There is actually no need to own a Subaru Outback...unless, like the TV puts it, you like...well you get it - hmm, maybe not!!!
After all dirty cars is not how nature intended us to be!
Claimer: Views presented in this article probably or definitely allude to people real, unreal, imaginary, virtual and otherwise. Any harm or libel cast on people dead, alive or transient is either intentional or otherwise. The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author, however he refuses to take responsibility for said views and believes the use of "airquotes" to be a birthright. Claims not included in this claim are also claimed.
Tuesday, October 21, 2008
You see it wasn't me, it was my mouth which has a tongue, which has a mind of its own...at least something in me has a mind..!
[Please click on title to read original article]
One thing is clear - you can never say Pawlenty or Bachmann have no functional minds, er..brains. Because, something works, sort of.
One opens her mouth and talks about something completely unrelated to her job in a completely inexplicable manner.
The other apparently claims, "If you talk all day, you are bound to make an idiot of yourself".
I wonder why God Jesus, who created the world and the dinosaurs not just more than 10,000 years ago, put a separate minds on our tongue....
BECAUSE
If you don't use your mind, your tongue will do it's own thinking and that ain't good for ya.
Really?
You Betcha!
Gosh Darn It, just ask Bachmann!!!
Claimer: Views presented in this article probably or definitely allude to people real, unreal, imaginary, virtual and otherwise. Any harm or libel cast on people dead, alive or transient is either intentional or otherwise. The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author, however he refuses to take responsibility for said views and believes the use of "airquotes" to be a birthright. Claims not included in this claim are also claimed.
One thing is clear - you can never say Pawlenty or Bachmann have no functional minds, er..brains. Because, something works, sort of.
One opens her mouth and talks about something completely unrelated to her job in a completely inexplicable manner.
The other apparently claims, "If you talk all day, you are bound to make an idiot of yourself".
I wonder why God Jesus, who created the world and the dinosaurs not just more than 10,000 years ago, put a separate minds on our tongue....
BECAUSE
If you don't use your mind, your tongue will do it's own thinking and that ain't good for ya.
Really?
You Betcha!
Gosh Darn It, just ask Bachmann!!!
Claimer: Views presented in this article probably or definitely allude to people real, unreal, imaginary, virtual and otherwise. Any harm or libel cast on people dead, alive or transient is either intentional or otherwise. The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author, however he refuses to take responsibility for said views and believes the use of "airquotes" to be a birthright. Claims not included in this claim are also claimed.
Monday, October 20, 2008
Nothing funny, but will still make you smile...
[Please click on title to read original article]
Far from the maddening crowd is a heartening story.
Someone who is responsible, at 106!!!
If you are any younger than 106, eligible to vote, to complain to act against injustices and elect not to do so, because you think your voice won't be counted in...shame on you!
If you have voted, smile :)
The elders are with you!
Claimer: Views presented in this article probably or definitely allude to people real, unreal, imaginary, virtual and otherwise. Any harm or libel cast on people dead, alive or transient is either intentional or otherwise. The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author, however he refuses to take responsibility for said views and believes the use of "airquotes" to be a birthright. Claims not included in this claim are also claimed.
Far from the maddening crowd is a heartening story.
Someone who is responsible, at 106!!!
If you are any younger than 106, eligible to vote, to complain to act against injustices and elect not to do so, because you think your voice won't be counted in...shame on you!
If you have voted, smile :)
The elders are with you!
Claimer: Views presented in this article probably or definitely allude to people real, unreal, imaginary, virtual and otherwise. Any harm or libel cast on people dead, alive or transient is either intentional or otherwise. The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author, however he refuses to take responsibility for said views and believes the use of "airquotes" to be a birthright. Claims not included in this claim are also claimed.
Sunday, October 19, 2008
RIAA to Judge: No one vexes the Vexterminator! Judge, now you listen to me..you better make her stop vexing us...
[Please click on title to read original article]
In case you did not know, the Repeated Idiocy Association of Asses otherwise known as the RIAA and operating under a false acronym as the Recording Industries Association of America, has not won a single case definitively.
So, in the landscape of American law, and Global humor, they are a blimp.
More like a bleep...many would say.
Their job includes refusing to admit that there are better ways to sell music, or in case of an ability to do so, make money out of it, and an incessant abuse of the American Judiciary System.
The American Judiciary System is of course filled with Judges who seem to like taking such abuse....hmm, what do we call people who like taking abuse and derive "pleasure" from it?
In any case, now that McCain who voted in favor of DCMA himself has found to be receiving his own medicine, you would think, things may change.
Of course McCain has his own problems, given how pallin' with Palin is not proving to be effective, at least in this week's phonothon of "people with nothing better to do than answer phone calls from media" have shown...
Coming back to the uninteresting, yet entertaining issue at hand, last month, something incredible happened.
A judgment delivered by a jury in the court of a seemingly manic-depressive Jammie Thomas (because he changed his mind about his own instructions!!! - after the jury delivered the verdict based ON his instructions) was overturned by the said Jammie Thomas himself/herself(?).
The premise of the judge, rightfully so, is that just making the songs available is not infringement.
Why?
If I left a book on the table and somebody walked off to a copier and made copies, am I liable because I did not put a frikking book under lock and key?
In any case, all's not well for the RIAA judgment. This was the only judgment that looked like it would stick.
But now even that is gone!
Why? Because the defense lawyer for this 22 year old lady is wanting the Texas judge (who is not Jammie Thomas) to look into that other judgment and review the case.
The RIAA is pissed!
Their logic?
Well, we are rich, and we have all these lawyers. How dare you oppose us?
When has that logic worked?
When Presidents signed "exceptions".
Of course, said Presidents became just as popular as the RIAA is today!
In any case, their claim is thus:
"Judge, since you already looked into this 2 times, why should you look into it? You are not so smart that you will see through us a third time!
Plus, like we said before, we are rich, and we have all these lawyers...
And now this 22 year old is just bothering us.
See, let's show it to you. We will use a big word: v-e-x-a-t-i-o-u-s
Get it?
Come on, let's get on with this.."
Except, it won't seem like it would work for now. Judges may like to take the pain from RIAA. But eventually they have the "potential" to see through things. Stress on potential.
Two important RIAA-related tidbits on this case:
1. Talk about much ado. All this is over 37 songs and $7,400.
2. The defense lawyer is saying he will settle for $1000 - $200 for six songs, all that the RIAA could manage to download and cause all this self-inflicted defamation!!!
Oh, how the un-mighty keep falling!
Claimer: Views presented in this article probably or definitely allude to people real, unreal, imaginary, virtual and otherwise. Any harm or libel cast on people dead, alive or transient is either intentional or otherwise. The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author, however he refuses to take responsibility for said views and believes the use of "airquotes" to be a birthright. Claims not included in this claim are also claimed.
In case you did not know, the Repeated Idiocy Association of Asses otherwise known as the RIAA and operating under a false acronym as the Recording Industries Association of America, has not won a single case definitively.
So, in the landscape of American law, and Global humor, they are a blimp.
More like a bleep...many would say.
Their job includes refusing to admit that there are better ways to sell music, or in case of an ability to do so, make money out of it, and an incessant abuse of the American Judiciary System.
The American Judiciary System is of course filled with Judges who seem to like taking such abuse....hmm, what do we call people who like taking abuse and derive "pleasure" from it?
In any case, now that McCain who voted in favor of DCMA himself has found to be receiving his own medicine, you would think, things may change.
Of course McCain has his own problems, given how pallin' with Palin is not proving to be effective, at least in this week's phonothon of "people with nothing better to do than answer phone calls from media" have shown...
Coming back to the uninteresting, yet entertaining issue at hand, last month, something incredible happened.
A judgment delivered by a jury in the court of a seemingly manic-depressive Jammie Thomas (because he changed his mind about his own instructions!!! - after the jury delivered the verdict based ON his instructions) was overturned by the said Jammie Thomas himself/herself(?).
The premise of the judge, rightfully so, is that just making the songs available is not infringement.
Why?
If I left a book on the table and somebody walked off to a copier and made copies, am I liable because I did not put a frikking book under lock and key?
In any case, all's not well for the RIAA judgment. This was the only judgment that looked like it would stick.
But now even that is gone!
Why? Because the defense lawyer for this 22 year old lady is wanting the Texas judge (who is not Jammie Thomas) to look into that other judgment and review the case.
The RIAA is pissed!
Their logic?
Well, we are rich, and we have all these lawyers. How dare you oppose us?
When has that logic worked?
When Presidents signed "exceptions".
Of course, said Presidents became just as popular as the RIAA is today!
In any case, their claim is thus:
"Judge, since you already looked into this 2 times, why should you look into it? You are not so smart that you will see through us a third time!
Plus, like we said before, we are rich, and we have all these lawyers...
And now this 22 year old is just bothering us.
See, let's show it to you. We will use a big word: v-e-x-a-t-i-o-u-s
Get it?
Come on, let's get on with this.."
Except, it won't seem like it would work for now. Judges may like to take the pain from RIAA. But eventually they have the "potential" to see through things. Stress on potential.
Two important RIAA-related tidbits on this case:
1. Talk about much ado. All this is over 37 songs and $7,400.
2. The defense lawyer is saying he will settle for $1000 - $200 for six songs, all that the RIAA could manage to download and cause all this self-inflicted defamation!!!
Oh, how the un-mighty keep falling!
Claimer: Views presented in this article probably or definitely allude to people real, unreal, imaginary, virtual and otherwise. Any harm or libel cast on people dead, alive or transient is either intentional or otherwise. The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author, however he refuses to take responsibility for said views and believes the use of "airquotes" to be a birthright. Claims not included in this claim are also claimed.
Friday, October 17, 2008
Fraud that claims that something else is fraud - The day the US Elections made me go gooblebooblebooble....
[Please click on title to read original article]
Confused? You betcha!
There you go again, thinking I am going to drag Palin or palling into this....
Gosh Darn It, you city folks!
Now that we have that nonsense out of the way, here is where the fun begins:
Our erstwhile McCain claims that every spelling mistake is an Obama perpetrated fraud. This is not at all surprising.
Not at all surprising you say?
Yeah, the way Democrats have projected Obama, he is omnipotent and omniscient (if you don't know what these words mean, well, you shouldn't read beyond this point - stuck up? you betcha!).
Thus, it is not impossible to conceive that Obama himself acted in massive voter fraud.
And so McCain did NOT abort the idea that Obama was directly involve in voter fraud. Note...did not abort - a strong tie to the party line.
Plus, this conception, or anti-abortion is very useful later.
How you say?
Well, who doesn't believe in grades? - Those that get bad ones.
Who doesn't believe in taxes? - Those that owe back taxes.
Who blames voter fraud? - Any party that loses. That means you too (and primarily you) Democrats!
So, its very useful.
Like saying, your brain is the reason why you are obese..."It's not you, it's me, I mean your brain, but wait, I don't exist...Ah! It hurts"
----
Anyway, first we hear the FBI is investigating ACORN.
Now we hear that the FBI is investigating those who claim that the FBI is investigating ACORN.
And I thought I had ADD!
Don't you love the fact that you don't work for the FBI?
Claimer: Views presented in this article probably or definitely allude to people real, unreal, imaginary, virtual and otherwise. Any harm or libel cast on people dead, alive or transient is either intentional or otherwise. The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author, however he refuses to take responsibility for said views and believes the use of "airquotes" to be a birthright. Claims not included in this claim are also claimed.
Confused? You betcha!
There you go again, thinking I am going to drag Palin or palling into this....
Gosh Darn It, you city folks!
Now that we have that nonsense out of the way, here is where the fun begins:
Our erstwhile McCain claims that every spelling mistake is an Obama perpetrated fraud. This is not at all surprising.
Not at all surprising you say?
Yeah, the way Democrats have projected Obama, he is omnipotent and omniscient (if you don't know what these words mean, well, you shouldn't read beyond this point - stuck up? you betcha!).
Thus, it is not impossible to conceive that Obama himself acted in massive voter fraud.
And so McCain did NOT abort the idea that Obama was directly involve in voter fraud. Note...did not abort - a strong tie to the party line.
Plus, this conception, or anti-abortion is very useful later.
How you say?
Well, who doesn't believe in grades? - Those that get bad ones.
Who doesn't believe in taxes? - Those that owe back taxes.
Who blames voter fraud? - Any party that loses. That means you too (and primarily you) Democrats!
So, its very useful.
Like saying, your brain is the reason why you are obese..."It's not you, it's me, I mean your brain, but wait, I don't exist...Ah! It hurts"
----
Anyway, first we hear the FBI is investigating ACORN.
Now we hear that the FBI is investigating those who claim that the FBI is investigating ACORN.
And I thought I had ADD!
Don't you love the fact that you don't work for the FBI?
Claimer: Views presented in this article probably or definitely allude to people real, unreal, imaginary, virtual and otherwise. Any harm or libel cast on people dead, alive or transient is either intentional or otherwise. The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author, however he refuses to take responsibility for said views and believes the use of "airquotes" to be a birthright. Claims not included in this claim are also claimed.
Wednesday, October 15, 2008
God is everywhere? Puhleeze...says this judge in Nebraska
[Please click on title to read original article]
I am not going to say, "I thought I had seen it all".
Because I did not think so. I did think that I was going to see it all some day. But literal idiocy is not something I thought I would see again, so soon.
Who is the idiot?
It is kinda hard to judge....oh no, no no not the judge....ha ha ha ha.
Well okay, so there is a total genius (you know what word I am replacing with genius right? I love asking those obviating questions...) who decided to show a bunch of people that the "court" is accessible to everyone, rich or poor.
So the genius (because he can find my address, right, so make up your own replacements for genius) decided to sue God.
Okay, now that gets the Republicans, Democrats and the Independents pissed...and don't even think of the ones that don't even like Celestial Cartoons....oh frack, you know, the guys who couldn't take a joke about ...?
Anyway, what does the judge do?
Not something I would have done:
Hold idiots in contempt of court.
Instead, he (or was it a she? I don't know, I was laughing so hard)decided to claim that God has no address.
Won't this get all the God, No-God and other freaks all riled up?
I mean, come on.....
So a complete ass files a fake lawsuit to convince people of something they are too lazy to figure out themselves and this supposedly intellectual judge could only come up with this cold soup for a response?
Are we in retarded times or what?
In case you think I am one sided, here is another obviation, restated for your convenience:
"Retire lazy, corrupt judges, CJI tells HCs" - in India
And Joe, yes, you, if you can read and furthermore, miraculously understand what you read, you are a pain in the you know what.....
I know it was unrelated, but hey, who cares about staying on topic!
Claimer: Views presented in this article probably or definitely allude to people real, unreal, imaginary, virtual and otherwise. Any harm or libel cast on people dead, alive or transient is either intentional or otherwise. The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author, however he refuses to take responsibility for said views and believes the use of "airquotes" to be a birthright. Claims not included in this claim are also claimed.
I am not going to say, "I thought I had seen it all".
Because I did not think so. I did think that I was going to see it all some day. But literal idiocy is not something I thought I would see again, so soon.
Who is the idiot?
It is kinda hard to judge....oh no, no no not the judge....ha ha ha ha.
Well okay, so there is a total genius (you know what word I am replacing with genius right? I love asking those obviating questions...) who decided to show a bunch of people that the "court" is accessible to everyone, rich or poor.
So the genius (because he can find my address, right, so make up your own replacements for genius) decided to sue God.
Okay, now that gets the Republicans, Democrats and the Independents pissed...and don't even think of the ones that don't even like Celestial Cartoons....oh frack, you know, the guys who couldn't take a joke about ...?
Anyway, what does the judge do?
Not something I would have done:
Hold idiots in contempt of court.
Instead, he (or was it a she? I don't know, I was laughing so hard)decided to claim that God has no address.
Won't this get all the God, No-God and other freaks all riled up?
I mean, come on.....
So a complete ass files a fake lawsuit to convince people of something they are too lazy to figure out themselves and this supposedly intellectual judge could only come up with this cold soup for a response?
Are we in retarded times or what?
In case you think I am one sided, here is another obviation, restated for your convenience:
"Retire lazy, corrupt judges, CJI tells HCs" - in India
And Joe, yes, you, if you can read and furthermore, miraculously understand what you read, you are a pain in the you know what.....
I know it was unrelated, but hey, who cares about staying on topic!
Claimer: Views presented in this article probably or definitely allude to people real, unreal, imaginary, virtual and otherwise. Any harm or libel cast on people dead, alive or transient is either intentional or otherwise. The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author, however he refuses to take responsibility for said views and believes the use of "airquotes" to be a birthright. Claims not included in this claim are also claimed.
Here is why you may never find these thieves..
[Please click on title to read original article]
You know...when someone says, "If you hit me in the head, it could be damaged!"
and you want to ask...
"How would we ever know?"
Have fun!
Claimer: Views presented in this article probably or definitely allude to people real, unreal, imaginary, virtual and otherwise. Any harm or libel cast on people dead, alive or transient is either intentional or otherwise. The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author, however he refuses to take responsibility for said views and believes the use of "airquotes" to be a birthright. Claims not included in this claim are also claimed.
You know...when someone says, "If you hit me in the head, it could be damaged!"
and you want to ask...
"How would we ever know?"
Have fun!
Claimer: Views presented in this article probably or definitely allude to people real, unreal, imaginary, virtual and otherwise. Any harm or libel cast on people dead, alive or transient is either intentional or otherwise. The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author, however he refuses to take responsibility for said views and believes the use of "airquotes" to be a birthright. Claims not included in this claim are also claimed.
So, like, I'm like, so much smarter than you, 'cause like...
[Please click on title to read original article]
..like I surf the interwebs almost 24 hours a day - that's almost 24 times more than you!!!
Suckers!
Ha ha.
Okay, in theory I completely agree with this UCLA scientist who "studied" people that surf the internet.
But what if I am gorging on porn, facebook, You Tube videos of cats and dogs making idiots of their owners with video cameras....
Well?
Or is it better if I live dangerously and surf calculus websites all night?
Hmm...life goes on!
Claimer: Views presented in this article probably or definitely allude to people real, unreal, imaginary, virtual and otherwise. Any harm or libel cast on people dead, alive or transient is either intentional or otherwise. The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author, however he refuses to take responsibility for said views and believes the use of "airquotes" to be a birthright. Claims not included in this claim are also claimed.
..like I surf the interwebs almost 24 hours a day - that's almost 24 times more than you!!!
Suckers!
Ha ha.
Okay, in theory I completely agree with this UCLA scientist who "studied" people that surf the internet.
But what if I am gorging on porn, facebook, You Tube videos of cats and dogs making idiots of their owners with video cameras....
Well?
Or is it better if I live dangerously and surf calculus websites all night?
Hmm...life goes on!
Claimer: Views presented in this article probably or definitely allude to people real, unreal, imaginary, virtual and otherwise. Any harm or libel cast on people dead, alive or transient is either intentional or otherwise. The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author, however he refuses to take responsibility for said views and believes the use of "airquotes" to be a birthright. Claims not included in this claim are also claimed.
Wednesday, October 08, 2008
Look who's stealing 'em Japanese jobs...
[Please click on title to read original article]
Just watch the video at
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/7654267.stm
and go back to work, slackers!!!
Claimer: Views presented in this article probably or definitely allude to people real, unreal, imaginary, virtual and otherwise. Any harm or libel cast on people dead, alive or transient is either intentional or otherwise. The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author, however he refuses to take responsibility for said views and believes the use of "airquotes" to be a birthright. Claims not included in this claim are also claimed.
Just watch the video at
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/7654267.stm
and go back to work, slackers!!!
Claimer: Views presented in this article probably or definitely allude to people real, unreal, imaginary, virtual and otherwise. Any harm or libel cast on people dead, alive or transient is either intentional or otherwise. The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author, however he refuses to take responsibility for said views and believes the use of "airquotes" to be a birthright. Claims not included in this claim are also claimed.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
